Evelyn Nissirios — Desperate to Avoid Prosecution, Tries Harassment and Retaliation
When Threats and Intimidation do not Work, Evelyn Nissirios Goes for Harassment and Retaliation, but Her Victims are Determined to Get Justice
There is nothing I would love more than to stop writing about Evelyn Nissirios; yet, there is never a quiet day for anyone forced to engage with her. Her unending acts of harassment now include frivolous restraining orders. She served both myself and my sister — the latter whom she almost killed via violent police raid. How ironic!
The police raid Nissirios organized through a false police report, within hours of being notified that my sister was suffering from a life-threatening medical emergency. Nissirios told multiple provable lies to the police, for which a civilian complaint has been filed. Her lies and acts of perjury in court exceed 350 counts over three years, for which another civilian complaint has been filed. Nissirios thus operates through constant lying, as dozens of litigants under her have testified on video record. And now, she has lied again in order to harass with false restraining orders!
Nissirios is charging my sister, a litigant she herself repeatedly assaulted, of “cyber harassment” and “stalking”. This is bizarre if not delusional, since my sister never messaged her outside of formal emails in the course of her litigation, which ended months ago. The State of New Jersey has rather criminally charged Nissirios for harassing my sister, for the episode that landed her in the emergency room; she was told that she could have died from life-threatening high blood pressures, as a direct result of Nissirios’ actions. Two days later, during a second life-threatening episode, soon after she notified the court, Nissirios took that opportunity to maliciously prosecute and to violently assault her, through police raid — in co-conspiracy with her violent husband, who had been plotting and attempting her “medical” demise for months.
Nissirios’ criminal charges were published earlier, at her community’s request (in the context of her ongoing contentious battle while illegitimately remaining on a Board of Education from which her community voted her out). Below are the criminal charges the State has issued against her co-conspirer and my domestic violence-offending brother-in-law:
I also do not understand why I would receive a restraining order, or how I have “cyber harassed” her. If she is referring to my articles, they are well within my First Amendment rights, as the legal department of one of the magazines she tried to harass has clarified:
this order requires that the [referenced article] must “be immediately removed, deleted, and unpublished”…. [Magazine] is not a party to this lawsuit, had no notice that such an order was being sought, and almost certainly is not subject to the court’s jurisdiction. In addition, it appears obvious to me that even if the order expressly covered the [Magazine] article, it would functionally be a presumptively unconstitutional prior restraint against ongoing publication.
I, too, was not under any jurisdiction other than my own federal lawsuit against her. Furthermore, my articles are not intended for Nissirios but for the public. How else would her potential victims learn about her deadly deeds, when she hides behind so respectable a title as “officer of the court,” or “member of the Board of Education,” all the while co-conspiring in child kidnapping, child rape, child torture, and attempted child murder on a daily basis, month after month, year after year, with impunity? If she believes I am defaming her, she knows what legal recourses she has; I more than welcome — and am eager to have — any opportunity for discovery!
Finally, I do not understand how I could have “stalked” her. If she is referring to my one appearance before her Board of Education, that was by invitation. On February 7, 2024, her community invited me to attend a public meeting of the Board, which Nissirios refused to leave, even after losing an election. Her community recently invited me to return — on July 17, 2024 — to confirm that Nissirios has criminal charges (the Board insisted she did not, even after I emailed them multiple times over several months about her charges). No revelation seems sufficient for them to let her go, regardless of the community’s wishes, and recently even the Board member the community had voted in to take her place resigned. Perhaps she was trying to prevent this meeting from happening through her restraining order.
The irony is, if anyone, I should be the one filing for a restraining order against Nissirios and her accomplice, Jane Gallina-Mecca! I am the one harassed and threatened for being a whistleblower and a witness, and given their track record of abuses of power and connections with multiple deaths, including that of a reporter, I should be the one fearing for my life! (indeed, I have notified everyone that, should something happen to me, these two are the culprits — in all my career treating the most violent individuals society produces, and even warning against a dangerous president, I have never felt my life so endangered as under these two).
In the end, I can only conclude that these restraining orders are more evidence of Nissirios’ criminality. In my twenty-five years of specializing in criminal psychology, I have found that desperate criminals always frame their victims with their own crimes. Does Nissirios believe that only nuisances to herself are “harassment”, and that her victims are simply supposed to “roll over” when she steals their children and condemns them to fates worse than death? This is the typical structure of a warped criminal mind, upon recognizing the end of her crime spree.
*This is the nineteenth article informing the public of Evelyn Nissirios’ criminal acts of violence against children, which she has covered up through extreme abuses of authority. As long as the child abuse, torture, rape, and battery continue, these articles will not end. Now, Nissirios is trying to stop them through harassment and retaliation. The Saddle River Board of Education, which has kept her on the Board — shockingly, even after the community voted her out — has been a co-conspirator in her crimes against children, by shielding her from accountability. However, all this is coming to an end. If Nissirios feels harassed by these articles, how will she deal with the books, the documentary, and the television series when they come out, where she will be a principal player and archetype? In the meantime, many are suffering the most unspeakable pain of seeing their children destroyed. Please sign the petition to impeach Nissirios’ accomplice, Judge Jane Gallina-Mecca, which has now exceeded 500 signatures! Several of Nissirios’ victims will participate in presenting it to the New Jersey Senate.