How Family Court Corruption Kills
Having a Case in Family Court Should Not be a Life Sentence for the Innocent Child and a Death Penalty for the Loving Parent — but Too Often It is
Here is one example of how it happens. The “guardian ad litem” (GAL) co-conspired with the violently abusive father to abduct two children from their loving home and nurturing mother, to transfer them to the violent father’s full custody. Being callous and uncaring of the children’s needs, the violent father has refused even one minute of visitation or phone call with the mother who singlehandedly raised them from birth, for a full three years — even though, or precisely because, there has been no finding of fault in her whatsoever (whereas he was on a restraining order for almost killing each of his children by head injury). The GAL is the court actor who facilitates this wrongful transfer of custody: she orchestrates the forced abduction, through violent police raid in this case; she uses her court authority to ensure that the pediatrician, school officials, and the police do not report evidence of violent abuse; she buries evidence and intimidates witnesses, through false arrests in this case; “exonerates” the violent parent by closing down investigations; and she “incriminates” the innocent parent through abuses of authority in a secretive court without oversight. Why? It is a multi-billion-dollar business, which yields lucrative returns for stealing children and trafficking them to the “wrong” parent. Since the “wrong” parent likely engages in violence, abuse, and all too often trafficking to pedophilic sex rings and the child pornography industry, this means that children are being auctioned off to their life sentences that invariably include torture but also at many times also battery, rape, suicide, or murder. Since the loving parent is a witness, she is intimidated, harassed, and sometimes killed. All this is happening to tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of children per year, simply for entering Family Court, perhaps thinking of getting a divorce…. Below is my supplemental reply/affidavit to the GAL who filed for a protective order against my sister (when the GAL is the one who literally came close to killing her three times — and a fourth time two days after this affidavit!) and a protective order against me for speaking about what she has done:
I, BANDY LEE, of full age, do hereby Certify/Swear as follows:
1. This is not a response to the contents of [GAL’s] Supplemental Certification but to the fact that she submitted one — against the Rules of the Court and in ways that threw both myself and [Patricia Lee’s] lawyer into confusion and chaos — to demonstrate why her application for a protective order should be reframed as an act of aggression, not a desire for protection, and why she must be referred to criminal court.
2. [GAL’s] style is very consistent. At the very last minute, she creates an ambush, so that her victim has no recourse for action. Literally, figuratively, and metaphorically, her actions are those of a predatory thug. She lies in ambush to outmaneuver her victims, not legally but through assaults so massive and unexpected that, by the time her victims recognize what is happening, it is often too late. She seizes children by police raid without warning, tortures the children and parent until they psychologically “break”, and then claim that the children had to be taken because the mother was “mentally ill.” This is what she attempted in Patricia Lee’s case, also: she assigned for her to have her children the weekend of November 12, 2021, and then manipulated the police to raid and seize her children, under the false accusation that she was “absconding” with them! Of course, she omitted the fact that November 12, 2021, was the very weekend she herself assigned for Patricia Lee to have the children (see Exhibit A). It is rather the massiveness and egregiousness of her lies that help her get away with them, since it would be unbelievable to most that an officer of the court could lie so blatantly and so viciously.
3. [GAL] is not afraid for her life; she is only afraid of accountability for her actual crimes and “damage” to her false reputation. The First Amendment exists to protect a citizen’s ability to criticize government abuses, including court appointees. [GAL] has filed for a protective order solely for the purpose of circumventing the First Amendment. If [GAL] believed my public writings were unfair or untrue, she had a recourse: a defamation lawsuit. She has not gone this route for one and only one reason: she does not have a case. Every word I have stated is true. Only in Family Court can she be totally untethered from the Law, which is why she is trying to force a square peg into the round hole of a protective order.
4. Your Honor is being used as a patsy. [GAL’s] certifications are replete with features of criminal psychology that would be immediately evident to a seasoned forensic psychiatrist or psychologist. You Honor knows there is no case, and it would be embarrassing for you to continue.
5. Judge Jane Gallina-Mecca, who enabled and supported [GAL’s] false witness, through her documented 600 lies and acts of perjury — is now being referred to the New Jersey Senate for impeachment with 1600 signatures and a half-dozen video-recorded testimonies.
6. By placing Your Honor in charge of something Judge Gallina-Mecca herself was rebuked for trying to do, you are being used to try to justify the unjustifiable. Whether you obsequiously go along with this pathetic attempt to violate the U.S. Constitution by silencing me will be a litmus test on your integrity as a judge — and could well define your reputation, also.
7. You have already stated that you will not subpoena a transcript that Judge Gallina-Mecca has sealed. At the same time, you allowed [GAL] to go as far back as November 2021 to support her argument — when the Victim’s Assistance and Survivor Protection Act (VASPA) permits complaints only from January 2024 onward.
8. You cannot hide behind your black robe. You unequivocally accepted [GAL’s] feeble rationalization and her feeble case without any credible evidence, and then issued possibly the most frivolous protective order in the history of jurisprudence.
9. That [GAL] is in no sense fearing for her life was evident when she made an offer to Defendant Patricia Lee — an offer to drop her case in exchange for no more articles. When Patricia Lee consented, under the condition that she access the transcript of November 12, 2021, [GAL] retracted her offer. If [GAL] were truly fearful for her life, why would she exchange it for a transcript? And what could be in that transcript that [GAL] is so terrified of revealing, that she cannot even allow Defendant’s lawyer to see it?
10. What is in that transcript is the fact that [GAL] has taken sadistic, perverted delight in kidnapping children from a devoted, loving parent, sent them to their torture, and then unconscionably and sadistically tormented these traumatized children by taunting them that their loving mother “abandoned” them. This is her consistent pattern, as several witnesses have attested to, and this is what she did on November 12, 2021, in collusion with Patricia Lee’s abusive spouse, Alan T. Chan, when she orchestrated her children’s abduction and refused to allow them to see or speak to their mother for even one minute in three years, much to the “alarm” and “shock” of several child psychiatrists who have consulted on the case.
11. What is the difference between what she did — police raiding Defendant Patricia Lee based on lies, violently seizing Defendant’s children, closing down Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCPP) investigations of the children’s violent abuser, transferring the children’s custody to their violent abuser, getting doctors arrested, getting Patricia Lee arrested, pressuring pediatricians to alter their medical records, pressuring the principal to change school attendance records, and keeping all court records sealed against Patricia Lee herself so that she cannot fight back — and kidnapping two children? There is no difference, once the smoke-and-mirrors “legality” she abuses is taken away.
12. The bitter irony is that a protective order needs to be issued against [GAL], for almost causing Patricia Lee’s death at least three times; causing four arrests of innocent people based on malicious prosecution; causing irreparable, irreversible psychological trauma and physical failure to thrive in two innocent, vulnerable children; and protecting their duly-diagnosed, psychopath father from criminal accountability, based on her 600 documented lies and acts of perjury!
13. [GAL] is hiding under the sanctuary of the court, and you are being used to cover for criminal acts for which she should be disbarred and incarcerated. [GAL] has made a mafia organization out of her court connections. Indeed, her guise of being an “officer of the court” has shielded her from prosecution for the most heinous, violent, and predatory crimes against innocent children and their loving parents. I am a mandated reporter of these crimes. This, and only this, is the reason [GAL] is petrified of my exercising my First Amendment rights, as well as my legally-mandated duty as a professional expert witness for the courts.
14. Not only did [GAL] file for a frivolous protective order, she intended to weaponize it for harm. [GAL] intimidated Defendant Patricia Lee as a witness of her crimes from the start. Hence, despite knowing of Patricia Lee’s life-threatening, stress-induced high blood pressure condition (see Exhibit B) — or precisely because of her knowledge of it — she is now using her phony “protective order” as an excuse to send the police to her home for her, for me, for an amended complaint, and for an amended complaint for me. Unsurprisingly, because of her life-threatening condition, Defendant Patricia Lee landed in the emergency room with life-threatening high blood pressures following this “protective order” (see Exhibit C), which the emergency physician stated could have killed her — and has now been bed-ridden for three months and ongoing. She already has Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations for the court, solely as a result of [GAL’s] assaults, as you know (she had no need before). Yet, despite these irrefutable, documented facts, Your Honor refused to issue a protective order for Defendant Patricia Lee. What does this say about your biased view of this case?
15. Your Honor should unequivocally dismiss this case, sanction [GAL] for filing for a frivolous protective order — in the same manner that [GAL] fined Patricia Lee 27,000 dollars for suing her, when [GAL] had caused Patricia Lee to lose her children without due process or cause — and refer [GAL] to criminal court. As her last-minute submission of a Certification showed, every action by [GAL] is consistent with the criminal pattern to “DARVO” (“Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender”) when one’s victim is most vulnerable — a well-known tactic of violent offenders. [GAL] was depending on her ability to “break” her victim psychologically through gaslighting, torture, intimidation, misinformation, disinformation, floods of useless information, lies, propaganda, and abuse of “judicial immunity” to get away with her crimes. But despite these insults, Patricia Lee is psychologically intact, as ten highly-qualified psychiatrists and psychologists attest to. Only her physical symptoms, in the form of stress-induced, lethal-level high blood pressure crises serve as a measure for [GAL’s] violent assaults, even when she disguises them in her highly psychopathic manner. Hence, Patricia Lee has accumulated abundant medical evidence and remains fully capable of testifying against [GAL] in a criminal court that actually looks at evidence and follows the Law — which has so far not happened in family court.
Signed, Bandy X. Lee, M.D., M.Div., and Notarized on the 17th day of October, 2024.
